Conference experiences have been explored a few times on this blog before, but given the apparent diversity of conference formats across disciplines, I think another perspective might be valuable. The topic is particularly on my mind since I recently attended the American Physical Society (the major professional society for physicists) March Meeting, which took place in Denver this year. March Meeting is by no means the only important conference in the physical sciences, but it is probably the biggest — almost 10,000 people, from undergrads to Nobel Prize winners, attend from all around the world.
I’ve been to March Meeting three times now, plus a few smaller conferences. Now that I’m nearing the end of graduate school, it thus seems like a sensible time to reflect on how to make the most of these trips. Optimizing your conference experience is important, since conferences are usually a substantial investment of your time, energy, and money (maybe your advisor’s money, but still…), and they can be key opportunities to advance your career. So here are some thoughts on the matter I’ve acquired over the past few years:
- Don’t try to attend everything. This was probably my biggest mistake at earlier conferences, and I think it’s a common one to make. It’s so easy to have eyes bigger than your brain when you look at the schedule of talks. I would try to attend everything the first day or two, and then I would inevitably burn out and end up missing or sleepwalking through some more important events later on. Try to prioritize the absolute most important things on the schedule before the trip, and make a reasonable plan of how much you can actually do. Be conservative with your judgment. It’s better to sleep late and attend only a few talks that you really pay attention to, rather than to wake up early and attend everything but be so tired that you don’t learn anything. So how should your prioritize events? Well…..
- Meeting people is the most important thing. Specifically, it is more important than any talk. Talks definitely can be useful — they put your finger on the pulse of cutting-edge research and can expand your breadth in unexpected ways — but there are still alternative ways of learning about research. You can always read someone’s papers if you really want to know about their work. But there is no substitute for interacting with people face-to-face at a conference. This is how you form new collaborations and meet people who may someday offer you a job. So when budgeting your time and energy, opportunities to meet people should always come first. Skip the talks and just go to the reception afterward if you have to. Now that I’ve stressed its importance, how do you actually go about meeting people?
- Be a little shameless. It’s hard to summon the courage to ask questions during a talk or introduce yourself to someone new, especially when they are much more senior and your questions and ideas seem naive. But you have to be a little shameless and do it anyway. The particle physicist Tommaso Dorigo has some nice ideas on his blog about how to come up with questions for these occasions. The point is that even if your questions are a bit vacuous, or your attempt to introduce yourself and shake hands with that famous person feels awkward and forced, the mere process of getting practice doing it will be beneficial. By the time your questions and ideas are more substantial, you’ll already feel quite comfortable speaking up. Despite science’s reputation as being the domain of introverts and nerds, in my experience the scientific community rewards assertive, outgoing social behavior, people who are aggressive about seeking knowledge and maybe even a little self-promoting. Being “that person who keeps asking questions” will make you stand out and gain respect as a passionate seeker of knowledge. I played such a role at a few events in the past (ones with small audiences, which made this a lot easier), and several people even told me afterward that they noticed me because of all my questions. Hopefully I wasn’t too annoying, but at least they noticed me! But besides meeting new people from scratch, a much easier route is to…..
- Use your existing connections to make new ones. It’s always easier to meet people through people you already know. So if you already know one or two people at a conference, spend enough time with them to meet some of the other people they know. Getting to know grad students or postdocs at other institutions is a great strategy: as a grad student yourself, it’s usually not too hard to meet and get quality time with other young people (compared to, say, faculty), and once you get to know each other, they should be more than happy to introduce you to their friends at their own institution or other people they happen to know. And you can do the same for them. Finally, once you’ve met some new people…..
- Follow up with the new people that you meet. This can be tricky, but it’s important if you want those new connections to last. I have been able to invite a few people I met at previous events to give seminars for our group here at Rutgers, which obviously helped a good deal in solidifying those relationships. But that’s not always possible. Sometimes it’s reasonable to send a follow up e-mail to someone you just met. For example, you might talk to someone about a paper they wrote, and after you go home and read it, you could easily send them an e-mail with a generic pleasantry (“It was nice to meet you at that conference…”) followed by a question or two about the paper. There’s no need to be sycophantic, but if you are honestly interested in their work, it shouldn’t be hard to come up with a few genuine questions. A short e-mail exchange like this will go a long way in preventing you both from forgetting each other. In the worst case, try to track down your new contacts at the next conference, even if it’s a year or two in the future. They’ll probably be flattered that you remembered them and reached out. If your memory for names and faces isn’t acute, find other ways of keeping track of the people you meet: for example, you can ask for business cards (not common in science, but apparently common in other disciplines) or keep a list of professional contacts.
I’m sure five years from now my views on conference-going will have evolved even further, but the foregoing points have at least served me well as I finish up my Ph.D. and prepare for the next stage. So I hope someone else will find them useful as well. In any case, I’m sure these issues probably vary widely across disciplines (and even within a discipline, too, depending on the conference), so different perspectives are welcome in the comments!